tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post3758330084634544986..comments2023-12-06T04:20:43.946+08:00Comments on 投資客日誌: 20120316投資日誌:經濟可預測嗎?Albert Hunghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09229454924757766541noreply@blogger.comBlogger12125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-50177277589845646582012-03-18T09:19:50.070+08:002012-03-18T09:19:50.070+08:00top down or bottom uptop down or bottom upelitienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-63314254005799857562012-03-18T09:18:22.696+08:002012-03-18T09:18:22.696+08:00bottom up or bottom down, that is a questionbottom up or bottom down, that is a questionccwhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09131596150528798990noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-91154249519727351392012-03-18T08:59:59.835+08:002012-03-18T08:59:59.835+08:00是我打錯字,多謝提醒是我打錯字,多謝提醒Albert Hunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09229454924757766541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-81527514727328415812012-03-18T08:33:34.770+08:002012-03-18T08:33:34.770+08:00作者已經移除這則留言。banhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04845137096796332674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-67122054855621278522012-03-18T08:32:29.828+08:002012-03-18T08:32:29.828+08:00外資跟大戶今天應該是多單減少 ,是板大筆誤嗎?外資跟大戶今天應該是多單減少 ,是板大筆誤嗎?banhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04845137096796332674noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-18829785974624505262012-03-17T23:34:07.947+08:002012-03-17T23:34:07.947+08:00這次巴菲特在股東年報的內容也有舉了幾個類似的判斷例子,包含旗下公司營運的狀況,以及房屋供需的合理性。...這次巴菲特在股東年報的內容也有舉了幾個類似的判斷例子,包含旗下公司營運的狀況,以及房屋供需的合理性。我想這些雖然不是什麼高深的指標,但是應該是可協助投資人判斷的一些方法...Albert Hunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09229454924757766541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-8758676492251185612012-03-17T23:23:10.870+08:002012-03-17T23:23:10.870+08:00我想,這也就是為什麼巴菲特會建議大家盡量只看公司本身的價值而不是總經數字我想,這也就是為什麼巴菲特會建議大家盡量只看公司本身的價值而不是總經數字Elitienoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-27633691067393718102012-03-17T13:38:30.282+08:002012-03-17T13:38:30.282+08:00我想的是,譬如歐債問題越滾越大,我們可能看到債務金額大的嚇人,經濟數據看來要崩潰。
但是也可換個方...我想的是,譬如歐債問題越滾越大,我們可能看到債務金額大的嚇人,經濟數據看來要崩潰。<br /><br />但是也可換個方式思考,如此重大的問題,歐洲的這些官員有可能會讓這種悲慘情況發生? 還是會盡所能降低風險?!Albert Hunghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09229454924757766541noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-47193187914065372642012-03-17T13:31:38.566+08:002012-03-17T13:31:38.566+08:00我想版大獎的是盤感嗎?!不管是收集很多總經指標及國際股市脈動後的 FU 所做的判斷?! 是嗎?我想版大獎的是盤感嗎?!不管是收集很多總經指標及國際股市脈動後的 FU 所做的判斷?! 是嗎?captainhttp://www.plurk.com/frostyennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-60373152359535722042012-03-17T13:10:05.849+08:002012-03-17T13:10:05.849+08:00搞到最後,也是要靠自己獨立思考才行呢搞到最後,也是要靠自己獨立思考才行呢Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-44885672961224926742012-03-17T00:04:03.838+08:002012-03-17T00:04:03.838+08:00Sorry! 是金融風暴Sorry! 是金融風暴勳noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3357856749857223468.post-32335573184712831322012-03-17T00:02:10.988+08:002012-03-17T00:02:10.988+08:00陳鳳馨在News98提到,
油價= 石油成本+政客+選票
看來股價也可以說 = 基本價值+政客(...陳鳳馨在News98提到, <br />油價= 石油成本+政客+選票<br /><br />看來股價也可以說 = 基本價值+政客(經融風報,歐債危機)+選票勳noreply@blogger.com